PRICES include / exclude VAT
>UNE standards>UNE CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017 - Electronic fee collection - Guidelines for security protection profiles (ISO/TS 17574:2017) (Endorsed by Asociación Española de Normalización in May of 2017.)
in stockReleased: 2017-05-01
UNE CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017 - Electronic fee collection - Guidelines for security protection profiles (ISO/TS 17574:2017) (Endorsed by Asociación Española de Normalización in May of 2017.)

UNE CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017

Electronic fee collection - Guidelines for security protection profiles (ISO/TS 17574:2017) (Endorsed by Asociación Española de Normalización in May of 2017.)

Peaje electrónico. Directrices para los perfiles de protección de la seguridad (ISO/TS 17574:2017) (Ratificada por la Asociación Española de Normalización en mayo de 2017.)

Format
Availability
Price and currency
English PDF
Immediate download
Printable
114.40 EUR
English Hardcopy
In stock
114.40 EUR
Standard number:UNE CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017
Pages:63
Released:2017-05-01
Status:Standard
DESCRIPTION

UNE CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017

This document provides a guideline for preparation and evaluation of security requirements specifications, referred to as Protection Profiles (PP) in ISO/IEC 15408 (all parts) and in ISO/IEC TR 15446. By Protection Profile (PP), it means a set of security requirements for a category of products or systems that meet specific needs. A typical example would be a PP for On-Board Equipment (OBE) to be used in an EFC system. However, the guidelines in this document are superseded if a Protection Profile already exists for the subsystem in consideration. The target of evaluation (TOE) for EFC is limited to EFC specific roles and interfaces as shown in Figure 1. Since the existing financial security standards and criteria are applicable to other external roles and interfaces, they are assumed to be outside the scope of TOE for EFC. The security evaluation is performed by assessing the security-related properties of roles, entities and interfaces defined in STs, as opposed to assessing complete processes which often are distributed over more entities and interfaces than those covered by the TOE of this document. NOTE Assessing security issues for complete processes is a complimentary approach, which may well be beneficial to apply when evaluating the security of a system.