PRICES include / exclude VAT
Homepage>BS Standards>03 SOCIOLOGY. SERVICES. COMPANY ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT. ADMINISTRATION. TRANSPORT>03.220 Transport>03.220.20 Road transport>PD CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017 Electronic fee collection. Guidelines for security protection profiles
Sponsored link
immediate downloadReleased: 2017-04-30
PD CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017 Electronic fee collection. Guidelines for security protection profiles

PD CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017

Electronic fee collection. Guidelines for security protection profiles

Format
Availability
Price and currency
English Secure PDF
Immediate download
377.00 USD
English Hardcopy
In stock
377.00 USD
Standard number:PD CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017
Pages:64
Released:2017-04-30
ISBN:978 0 580 94774 2
Status:Standard
DESCRIPTION

PD CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017


This standard PD CEN ISO/TS 17574:2017 Electronic fee collection. Guidelines for security protection profiles is classified in these ICS categories:
  • 35.240.60 IT applications in transport and trade
  • 03.220.20 Road transport

This document provides guidelines for preparation and evaluation of security requirements specifications, referred to as Protection Profiles (PP) in ISO/IEC 15408 ( all parts ) and in ISO/IEC TR 15446 .

By Protection Profile (PP), it means a set of security requirements for a category of products or systems that meet specific needs. A typical example would be a PP for On-Board Equipment (OBE) to be used in an EFC system. However, the guidelines in this document are superseded if a Protection Profile already exists for the subsystem in consideration.

The target of evaluation (TOE) for EFC is limited to EFC specific roles and interfaces as shown in Figure 1. Since the existing financial security standards and criteria are applicable to other external roles and interfaces, they are assumed to be outside the scope of TOE for EFC.

Figure 1 Scope of TOE for EFC

image

The security evaluation is performed by assessing the security-related properties of roles, entities and interfaces defined in security targets (STs), as opposed to assessing complete processes which often are distributed over more entities and interfaces than those covered by the TOE of this document.

NOTE Assessing security issues for complete processes is a complimentary approach, which may well be beneficial to apply when evaluating the security of a system.