PRICES include / exclude VAT
Homepage>BS Standards>91 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND BUILDING>91.100 Construction materials>91.100.30 Concrete and concrete products>PD CEN/TS 12390-9:2016 Testing hardened concrete Freeze-thaw resistance with de-icing salts. Scaling
immediate downloadReleased: 2016-12-31
PD CEN/TS 12390-9:2016 Testing hardened concrete Freeze-thaw resistance with de-icing salts. Scaling

PD CEN/TS 12390-9:2016

Testing hardened concrete Freeze-thaw resistance with de-icing salts. Scaling

Format
Availability
Price and currency
English Secure PDF
Immediate download
317.20 USD
You can read the standard for 1 hour. More information in the category: E-reading
Reading the standard
for 1 hour
31.72 USD
You can read the standard for 24 hours. More information in the category: E-reading
Reading the standard
for 24 hours
95.16 USD
English Hardcopy
In stock
317.20 USD
Standard number:PD CEN/TS 12390-9:2016
Pages:36
Released:2016-12-31
ISBN:978 0 580 92163 6
Status:Standard
DESCRIPTION

PD CEN/TS 12390-9:2016


This standard PD CEN/TS 12390-9:2016 Testing hardened concrete is classified in these ICS categories:
  • 91.100.30 Concrete and concrete products

This Technical Specification describes the testing of the freeze-thaw scaling resistance of concrete both with water and with sodium chloride solution. It can be used either to compare new constituents or new concrete compositions against a constituent or a concrete composition that is known to give adequate performance in the local environment or to assess the test results against some absolute numerical values based on local experiences.

Extrapolation of test results to assess different concretes, i.e. new constituents or new concrete compositions, requires an expert evaluation.

NOTE

In some cases the test methods may not be suitable for testing special concretes e.g. high strength concrete or permeable concrete. In these cases the result needs to be treated with caution. Also, the testing methods included in this document may not identify aggregates that are subject to occasional ‘pop-outs’.

There is no established correlation between the results obtained by the three test methods. All tests will clearly identify poor and good behaviour, but they differ in their assessment of marginal behaviour. The application of different acceptance limits for test results enables assessment for different degrees of exposure severity. In case of justified modifications of the test parameters, precautions might apply. Some alternative applications are described in Annex A.